On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
tl;dr - please test dev-libs/icu-50.1-r2 and report if it works for you
or not; if it doesn't, please try dev-libs/icu-50.1-r1 and also report
I've done two version bumps of dev-libs/icu related to the c++11 bug
On 11/14/12 9:09 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On 14/11/2012 21:02, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
My _limited_ testing seems to indicate it's working. But if you
people can just do your tests, that would be most welcome. Please
report back either success or failure.
What kind of testing are you
On 15/11/2012 21:13, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
-r1 disables C++11 completely, while -r2 just allows reverse
dependencies of icu not to support C++11, while possibly making icu use
C++11 features internally (I was asked by an upstream icu developer to
test that; if this still causes problems, we
tl;dr - please test dev-libs/icu-50.1-r2 and report if it works for you
or not; if it doesn't, please try dev-libs/icu-50.1-r1 and also report
I've done two version bumps of dev-libs/icu related to the c++11 bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439892 (feel free to add the
package to the
On 14/11/2012 21:02, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
My _limited_ testing seems to indicate it's working. But if you people
can just do your tests, that would be most welcome. Please report back
either success or failure.
What kind of testing are you thinking of? Execution or build? And I
assume this
