Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/yacc

2011-08-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 19:21:15 Mike Frysinger wrote: now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding virtual/yacc which has || ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc ). implemented and

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/yacc

2011-08-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 23:32:09 Matt Turner wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding

[gentoo-dev] new virtual/yacc

2011-08-07 Thread Mike Frysinger
now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding virtual/yacc which has || ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc ). once that settles, i'll probably relocate bison to dev-util. -mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/yacc

2011-08-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of yacc, we need a virtual.  so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding virtual/yacc which has || ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc ). once

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual/yacc

2011-08-07 Thread David Leverton
On Aug 8, 2011 12:22 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: virtual/yacc which has || ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc ). No dev-util/byacc?