On 08/10/2010 11:29 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
many software projects (including Chromium) target.
And that is bad.
Why are we using
On 8/10/10 9:51 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hardcoding paths is a bad design™.
Well, yeah, it could be done better. Hmm, I will think more about it.
On 8/10/10 9:54 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
Why can chromium not do like firefox and others and make the plugins
dir scalable via a wrapper
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:12:39 -0700
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Could you give an example? I'm just curious. Different distros use
different paths, so that could lead to problems. Or are they trying to
recognize the running distro?
www-plugins/adobe-flash:
Am Dienstag 10 August 2010 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
Am Dienstag 10 August 2010 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
many software projects (including Chromium)
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how
relalistic would it be to
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how
relalistic would it be to switch to mozilla/plugins?
--- nsplugins.eclass 1 May 2009 23:03:00 -
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
what many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Could you name
On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
what many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Could you name them? Opera looks into tons of
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
By the way, I just wonder... why not _symlink_ mozilla/plugins to
nsbrowser/plugins? That would solve the technical problem, while
keeping a good, more general name.
some plugins like to change their behavior based on the path they're
On Wednesday 11 of August 2010 05:50:47 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
what many software projects (including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2010 11:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
By the way, I just wonder... why not _symlink_ mozilla/plugins to
nsbrowser/plugins? That would solve the technical problem, while
keeping a
12 matches
Mail list logo
