On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:22, William Hubbs wrote:
> The more important part of this test is that we need some users to
> migrate from baselayout-1 to openrc-0.8.2-r1 and be sure that is
> successful.
I migrated a mostly-stable (so baselayout-1) amd64 server to
baselayout-2.0.2 with openrc-0.8.2
William Hubbs wrote:
All,
The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1.
The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so
the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08
respectively.
The more important part of this test is that we nee
All,
The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1.
The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so
the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08
respectively.
The more important part of this test is that we need some users to
migrat
110418 Marijn wrote:
> On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote:
>> - news item release on 5/1
>> - stabilization on 5/8.
> Please, to avoid confusion, use month names instead of numbers
> or include the year so people don't have to deduce the ordering.
Seconded. In fact,
has Gentoo not adopted the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote:
> ll,
>
> there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate.
>
> I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very
> small, we should keep the news item date and stabiliza
ll,
there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate.
I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very
small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my
original announcement.
- news item release on 5/1
- stabilization on 5/8.
Willi
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> also, we're still sitting on top of classical sysvinit, so i'm not sure
> openrc
> technically qualifies as an "init" system. certainly not a "full" one.
That's true. Openrc is not really a full init system. It is a set of
init s
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 08:00:44 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
> > I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all
> > the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
>
> We should certainly get a news item together, since thi
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:00:44AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a huge deal
> for Gentoo. Although no doubt non-Gentoo people will start laughing at
> yet another "new" init system. =)
Openrc is not just a gentoo init system; I know
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:00:44 -0500
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
> > I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of
> > all the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
>
> We should certainly get a news item together, since this
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:00:44AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
> > I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all
> > the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
>
> We should certainly get a news item together, sinc
On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote:
> I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all
> the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter?
We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a huge deal
for Gentoo. Although no doubt non-Gentoo people will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/11 08:52, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 12/04/2011 16:56, William Hubbs a écrit :
>> All,
>>
>> at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
>
> Thanks to all of you who worked on this over the years, your efforts are
> _really_ appreciated.
Le 12/04/2011 16:56, William Hubbs a écrit :
> All,
>
> at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
Thanks to all of you who worked on this over the years, your efforts are
_really_ appreciated.
> This means we need more testers.
Openrc being so central to Gentoo, may I suggest a bigger c
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:56:22AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
>
> This means we need more testers.
>
> We need some people who are still using baselayout-1 to migrate to
> baselayout-2 and openrc to make sure that still is successful.
On 04/12/11 16:56, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
>
Thanks to all who kept chiseling away at this issue - it's nice to see
that we still can get things done, even if it sometimes takes a week or
hundred more than initially planned.
I hope it all
All,
at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate.
This means we need more testers.
We need some people who are still using baselayout-1 to migrate to
baselayout-2 and openrc to make sure that still is successful. Also, we
need developers to upgrade to openrc-0.8.1 and let us know if there a
17 matches
Mail list logo
