On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:27 am, Harald van Dk wrote:
Perhaps
make.conf.example (that's provided by portage, right?) should include
CBUILD, assuming it doesn't cause problems?
i'm afraid the possibility of users botching this makes it not worth the
effort
better to keep the definition of
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:52 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 08:27 am, Harald van Dk wrote:
Perhaps
make.conf.example (that's provided by portage, right?) should include
CBUILD, assuming it doesn't cause problems?
i'm afraid the possibility of users botching this
