Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:14 AM Marek Szuba wrote: > > On 2020-04-20 06:13, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > He has been on devaway for a while. > > > > I would've much rather seen the differences between -r0 -r1 ebuilds to > > focus on what is actually done there. Not that I have any say what will > > be done in the end, but it's easier for the eyes... > > Indeed, that is a bit of a problem with revbumps. That said, jer did > update the ebuilds today (jer: thank you!) so no list review will be > required after all... > > OpenCL status update: looks like we are good to go, I'll run some tests > to confirm that there are no obvious issues with the deptree and > assuming there aren't, will unleash the whole thing (by which I mean > "post the news item and unmask the updated loader packages") on the > unsuspecting public this weekend. Great! Thank you so much for your work on this.
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader
On 2020-04-20 06:13, Joonas Niilola wrote: > He has been on devaway for a while. > > I would've much rather seen the differences between -r0 -r1 ebuilds to > focus on what is actually done there. Not that I have any say what will > be done in the end, but it's easier for the eyes... Indeed, that is a bit of a problem with revbumps. That said, jer did update the ebuilds today (jer: thank you!) so no list review will be required after all... OpenCL status update: looks like we are good to go, I'll run some tests to confirm that there are no obvious issues with the deptree and assuming there aren't, will unleash the whole thing (by which I mean "post the news item and unmask the updated loader packages") on the unsuspecting public this weekend. -- MS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader
On 4/19/20 11:40 PM, Marek Szuba wrote: > As previously mentioned, x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is the last OpenCL > runtime we have got in the tree to be migrated to the "must use an ICD > loader" approach to virtual/opencl. Unfortunately I have so far failed > to reach the maintainer of this package (jer) by either e-mail, > Bugzilla, or IRC - so I'm submitting this for review here. > > > He has been on devaway for a while. I would've much rather seen the differences between -r0 -r1 ebuilds to focus on what is actually done there. Not that I have any say what will be done in the end, but it's easier for the eyes... -- juippis signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
