-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 03:58 PM, Magnus Granberg wrote:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track this [1].
The affected Gcc version will be 4.8.2 and newer. Only
El jue, 09-01-2014 a las 21:58 +0100, Magnus Granberg escribió:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track this [1].
The affected Gcc version will be 4.8.2 and newer. Only amd64, x86, mips, ppc,
ppc64
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 09-01-2014 a las 21:58 +0100, Magnus Granberg escribió:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track this [1].
The affected Gcc version will be 4.8.2 and newer.
torsdag 09 januari 2014 22.57.09 skrev Pacho Ramos:
El jue, 09-01-2014 a las 21:58 +0100, Magnus Granberg escribió:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug to track this [1].
The affected Gcc version will
El jue, 09-01-2014 a las 17:06 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 09-01-2014 a las 21:58 +0100, Magnus Granberg escribió:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:11:28PM -0500, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 03:58 PM, Magnus Granberg wrote:
Hi
Some time ago we discussed that we should enable stack smashing
(-fstack-protector) by default. So we opened a bug
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the advantages of disabling SSP to deserve that special
handling via USE flag or easily disabling it appending the flag?
There are some cases where ssp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the advantages of disabling SSP to deserve that special
handling
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the advantages of disabling SSP to deserve that special
handling via USE flag or easily disabling it appending
On 01/09/2014 05:29 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the
On 01/09/2014 05:29 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 06:01 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014 04:57 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What are the advantages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 06:09 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 01/09/2014 05:29 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile
On 01/09/2014 06:13 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2014 06:01 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 01/09/2014 05:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 17:06:52
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 01/09/2014
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I never felt manipulating cflags with use flags was a great idea, but in
this case is does feel extra pointless.
Tend to agree, though one place I could see it being hypothetically
useful is if we need to set a
Dnia 2014-01-09, o godz. 18:59:26
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
I never felt manipulating cflags with use flags was a great idea, but in
this case is does feel extra pointless.
Tend to agree,
16 matches
Mail list logo