Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-06-12 Thread William Hubbs
All, this patch is being committed today. Thanks, William signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi, On 5/12/20 6:40 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 5/12/20 8:36 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: >> My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have >> enabled. >> >> Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to >> remember the update of those ebuilds in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 5/12/20 8:36 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > > My concern was about the others, for instance go-overlay that I have > enabled. > > Should it be possible to run a QA check to create a bug request to > remember the update of those ebuilds in the overlays? > > This would reduce the bug management

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi William, On 5/12/20 4:38 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > this change will apply to all users of the eclass. > > Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work. > > Also, keepin mind that there was a qa warning in place for this issue > for 3 months, so overlay owners

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:41:45AM +0100, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi William, > > How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8? Hi Samuel, this change will apply to all users of the eclass. Overlays are not considered blockers for in-tree eclass work. Also,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:47:23PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > > > have EGO_VENDOR set

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:58 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > > All, > > > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-12 Thread Samuel Bernardo
Hi William, How about overlays using the eclass, will this changes only apply to EAPI 8? Thanks, Samuel On 5/10/20 10:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > go-module.eclass. > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. > > > > You can't commit this as long

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. > > You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree. Sure, and I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > > > All, > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > > go-module.eclass. > > > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass. You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, qa,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:13:19PM +0200, David Seifert wrote: > On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs > > wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR > > > support from > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread David Seifert
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs > wrote: > > All, > > > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR > > support from > > go-module.eclass. > > > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/1] remove EGO_VENDOR support from go-module.eclass

2020-05-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote: > > All, > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from > go-module.eclass. > > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa > warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.