Ühel kenal päeval, P, 26.12.2021 kell 10:50, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> On Sun, 2021-12-26 at 09:44 +, Marek Szuba wrote:
> >
> > On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp,
> > > because emktemp
On Sun, 2021-12-26 at 09:44 +, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>
> > Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp,
> > because emktemp supported other cases than a pure mktemp usage does.
> > But I don't know if it could ever
On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp,
>because emktemp supported other cases than a pure mktemp usage does.
>But I don't know if it could ever clash things in some weird
>situations.
That last part is the
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 13.12.2021 kell 10:19, kirjutas Marek Szuba:
> On 2021-12-09 15:04, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Why do you need to use random name in the first place? We have
> > full
> > control over T, so why not just hardcode a good name?
>
> Having discussed the matter with eclass
On 2021-12-09 15:04, Michał Górny wrote:
Why do you need to use random name in the first place? We have full
control over T, so why not just hardcode a good name?
Having discussed the matter with eclass maintainers on IRC, they are not
entirely sure whether using a static name in this
On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 13:23 +, Marek Szuba wrote:
> Has been deprecated for quite a while now, comes from eutils.eclass
> so it blocks EAPI 8+. Just call mktemp directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szuba
> ---
> eclass/gnome2-utils.eclass | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4
