Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-26 Thread Samuel Bernardo
On 5/22/20 9:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed > in bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain > the default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it? In my Gentoo maintenance scripts I'm using

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-24 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed > in bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain > the default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it? I continue to use LILO because simpler and more mature code is good,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 08:48 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in > > bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the > > default? Do you think it is worthwhile to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in > bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the > default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it? For GRUB, wouldn't the typical workflow

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Friday, May 22, 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've finally found some time to revive eclean-kernel, and I'm having > some doubts about the way bootloaders are used (in ek1). I'd like to > hear your opinion on whether the old behavior should be kept or removed > in favor of