On 5/22/20 9:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed
> in bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain
> the default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it?
In my Gentoo maintenance scripts I'm using
eclean-
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed
> in bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain
> the default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it?
I continue to use LILO because simpler and more mature code is good,
es
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 08:48 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in
> > bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the
> > default? Do you think it is worthwhile to co
> On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in
> bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the
> default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it?
For GRUB, wouldn't the typical workflow remov
On Friday, May 22, 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I've finally found some time to revive eclean-kernel, and I'm having
> some doubts about the way bootloaders are used (in ek1). I'd like to
> hear your opinion on whether the old behavior should be kept or removed
> in favor of more