On Friday 16 September 2005 17:42, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
If we'll find other functions needed for portability's sake, they'll
probably going to be there, too.
Dropped the symcmd function, cleaned up the treecopy function (Martin, take a
look at cp --parent, what treecopy does is just
On Friday 16 September 2005 11:42 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
the second one is a commodity function to symlink
commands and manpages at once (as done by bsdtar and other packages).
i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage is
compressed with gzip (or
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 17:42 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
If nobody finds problem in the attached eclass, I'm going to commit this
tonight or tomorrow.
The first function is a drop-in replacement for cp --parent (that doesn't
work
on BSD userland), the second one is a commodity
On Friday 16 September 2005 18:16, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
I do not think its so urgent? Either way, we have elibs approved now,
so how about waiting a while so that we do not have yet another elib
candidate to port?
There are at least two ebuilds in portage that uses cp --parente . It wasn't
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 18:33 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 17:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage is
compressed with gzip (or compressed at all) is wrong
Doesn't portage always gzip manpages?
On Friday 16 September 2005 12:33 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 17:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i dont see this being really useful ... either way, assuming the manpage
is compressed with gzip (or compressed at all) is wrong
Doesn't portage always gzip
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 19:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
current stable does yes, but ive started adding customizable compression to
trunk
Okay, then *that* is a problem :P Suggestion how to fix it?
You are going to have to ask portage what it used via a
On Friday 16 September 2005 01:36 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 19:28, Mike Frysinger wrote:
current stable does yes, but ive started adding customizable compression
to trunk
Okay, then *that* is a problem :P Suggestion how to fix it?
simple, dont add the
