On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
> architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with
> the general
> On 21 Oct 2021, at 18:04, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
>> Hello,
>> =20
>> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
>> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
>>
> On 23 Oct 2021, at 14:40, Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 23 Oct 2021, at 02:55, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-10-21 17:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy.
In
> On 23 Oct 2021, at 02:55, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2021-10-21 17:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>>> 4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy.
>>> In the end, this leads to absurdities like GLSA being released
On 2021-10-21 17:16, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy.
In the end, this leads to absurdities like GLSA being released before
a package is stable on amd64, and confusing the users [4].
This
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> Splitting from the discussion in [1] (moving more arhitectures to
> ~arch), I'd like to propose that we remove the "security supported"
> architecture list from [2] and instead level security support with
> the
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:05 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> 4. In the end, Security team isn't really respecting this policy.
> In the end, this leads to absurdities like GLSA being released before
> a package is stable on amd64, and confusing the users [4].
This is certainly an absurd mistake, but I
Hi Michał,
I do agree with the gist of what you're saying, and in absence of a
better solution I'm in support.
I also make a disclaimer: I only use amd64 so none of this really
affects me, so at the end of the day - I don't really care.
We have tinderboxes already running that does all kinds
