Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles

2009-09-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 11 September 2009 19:48:03 George Prowse wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: ... Why not tie the the thing that makes Gentoo unique and one of the major reasons why users use it to the version numbers - Portage. We had 1.2, then 1.4 then 2004.0 and if i'm not mistaken portage is at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles

2009-09-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 29 August 2009 05:42:45 Duncan wrote: Mike Frysinger posted on Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:56:33 -0400 as excerpted: On Friday 28 August 2009 20:05:12 Alex Alexander wrote: On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 00:23, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 28 August 2009 16:27:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2009.0 profiles

2009-09-11 Thread George Prowse
Mike Frysinger wrote: ... Why not tie the the thing that makes Gentoo unique and one of the major reasons why users use it to the version numbers - Portage. We had 1.2, then 1.4 then 2004.0 and if i'm not mistaken portage is at 2.1 currently. Tie it in and we have 2.2 (currently masked)