Vlastimil Babka a écrit :
How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge --noreplace
debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something.
Bellow is my contribution to this thread :)
Cheers,
Rémi
--- kernel-2.eclass 2007-12-17 17:06:02.0 +0100
+++ kernel-2.eclass
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:45 +, Duncan wrote:
How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge --noreplace
debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something.
Well, that doesn't help those who get their kernels elsewhere, which IMO
are the ones most likely to have their own
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Do we really need a front-page news item for this? I don't think the
impact would be terribly great, as I suspect this affects a very small
number of people whom are likely to be more advanced users. I think
adding the info to GMN/gentoo-dev-announce/gentoo-user should
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 14:21 +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Do we really need a front-page news item for this? I don't think the
impact would be terribly great, as I suspect this affects a very small
number of people whom are likely to be more advanced users. I think
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:50:21 +0100
Rémi Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlastimil Babka a écrit :
How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge
--noreplace debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something.
Bellow is my contribution to this thread :)
Cheers,
Rémi
Duncan wrote:
A GWN or similar announcement before it moves beyond the dev profiles
would be nice, but if the affected devs (incl. bugwranglers) are willing
to deal with the complaints and they seem to be, the leaner system and
image is IMO a good thing, and announcement or not, people really
