On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting
our last 2.4 kernel sources in the tree, gentoo-sources-2.4. Since we
no longer have an officially supported 2.4 kernel on alpha/sparc/x86, I
have
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel team has stopped supporting
our last 2.4 kernel
On Monday 27 August 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel
On Monday 27 August 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 21:21 +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:08:34PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:57:48AM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As many of you may know, the Gentoo Kernel
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a
couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean:
a) it is still wanted
-or-
b) it is still valid
so what is the 2.4 status then ?
Well, we still don't support it
On E, 2007-08-27 at 17:11 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a
couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean:
a) it is still wanted
-or-
b) it is still valid
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 16:18 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Let this be a lesson to everyone. Just because you discussed it a
couple months ago doesn't necessarily mean:
a) it is still wanted
-or-
b) it is still valid
so what is the 2.4 status then ?
Well, we still
