Re: [gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
On Thursday 02 July 2009 13:47:45 Michael Higgins wrote: > On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700 Ned Ludd wrote: > > My only intention was to help offset > > dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us. > > Well that has been accomplished for now (w00t). > > What is this all about? Did I miss something? Was Gentoo threatened with > takeover? please review the current/last week threads. as a general statement, you cant ignore recent threads on the mailing list and then respond to newer ones going "what is this all about". -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700 Ned Ludd wrote: > My only intention was to help offset > dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us. > Well that has been accomplished for now (w00t). What is this all about? Did I miss something? Was Gentoo threatened with takeover? Cheers, -- |\ /|| | ~ ~ | \/ ||---| `|` ? ||ichael | |iggins\^ / michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org
Re: [gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
Ned Ludd a écrit : [snip, lots of insightful stuff I either agree with or don't really understand] So lets have some damn fun again !...@#$ _That_ I whole heartedly agree with. Please, all of you in the new council, try to keep this in mind :) Thanks Rémi
Re: [gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone?
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:33:52 -0700 Ned Ludd wrote: >huge fscking snip< Thank you. You were top of my list and I am counting on you. :) Regards, jer
