Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:09 PM Matt Turner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:54 PM Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > > On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > See also this related old thread: > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:54 PM Dennis Schridde wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > See also this related old thread: > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/e04f6d321e424a237af62721d1d09 > > 211 > > I think tackling the triad of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 21/11/19 21:53, Dennis Schridde wrote: > On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> See also this related old thread: >> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/e04f6d321e424a237af62721d1d09 >> 211 > I think tackling the triad of opengl/gles, egl/glx, X/wayland

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Dennis Schridde
On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: > See also this related old thread: > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/e04f6d321e424a237af62721d1d09 > 211 I think tackling the triad of opengl/gles, egl/glx, X/wayland is also a good idea. Generally, all these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:32 PM Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > > Hello gentoo-dev, > > First proposition on this list so hopefully not missing some kind of > netiquette/policy. > > I noticed for some time that there seems to be two use cases for the > gles[123] family of USE flags in gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 11/20/19 10:32 PM, Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > > To reflect this I think the "gles[123]" USE flags should be renamed, > first kind to "gles[123]support" and second kind to "gles[123]only". > Might also be the time to globalize them? I'm not sure but I think that > would help in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Mart Raudsepp
See also this related old thread: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/e04f6d321e424a237af62721d1d09211

Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123]

2019-11-21 Thread Dennis Schridde
Hello everyone! On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 04:32:34 CET Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier wrote: > I noticed for some time that there seems to be two use cases for the > gles[123] family of USE flags in gentoo repo: > 1. enabling support of OpenGL ES, which seems interesting to have for > more