Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item - v2

2014-02-03 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:


On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:

Here's v2 of the news item.
I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with 
catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don't mind 
restricting the news item to , in which case I'll drop the note about 
this only affecting .


I've committed this news item to the gentoo-news repository.

Regards,

Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-30 Thread Alex Xu
On 29/01/14 10:36 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
 On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Matt Turner wrote:
 
 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
 jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
 +Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst

 Display-If-Installed: =dev-util/catalyst-
 
 Matt,
 
 my plan was to show this to anyone using catalyst. I believe this news
 item is relevant and interesting for anyone using catalyst, but if
 others disagree, I can restrict it to only those using catalyst-.
 
 Regards,
 
 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
 Gentoo Developer
 

If you insist on showing it to everyone, make it clear that this only
affects people on -.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-30 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:25:08 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:

  +report issues to the catalyst team,
 
 This reads “catalyst@” to me, which is fine if that's what you indend.
 However, you may want to suggest gentoo-catalyst@ instead, if you want
 a wider net of possible responders.

Issues should be tracked in our bug tracker so that everyone can find
them (including users subscribed to random mailing lists).

https://bugs.gentoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Gentoo%20Hosted%20Projects
   Component: Catalyst


Regards,
 jer



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-30 Thread Peter Stuge
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
 +After many years of stalled development

I'm quite allergic to statements like this.

Remember that you may not really be representing everyone when you
express your own opinion - even if it is shared by many.

many years of stalled development can only be true if there was no
development whatsoever for many years - which I don't really think
fits catalyst at all.

I think the statements discards the efforts that have gone into
catalyst during the last many years - however small!


//Peter



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-30 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Peter Stuge wrote:


Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:

+After many years of stalled development


I'm quite allergic to statements like this.

Remember that you may not really be representing everyone when you
express your own opinion - even if it is shared by many.

many years of stalled development can only be true if there was no
development whatsoever for many years - which I don't really think
fits catalyst at all.

I think the statements discards the efforts that have gone into
catalyst during the last many years - however small!


I understand your comment and in principle agree with it. However, in this 
case, as I was one of those closest to the catalyst development in the 
mentioned period, I believe I'm entitled to use such words about myself 
;)

In any case, I'll present v2 in a bit to address the comments thus far.


//Peter






Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item - v2

2014-01-30 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:

Here's v2 of the news item.
I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with 
catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don't 
mind restricting the news item to , in which case I'll drop the note 
about this only affecting .



Hi.

I would like to commit the following news item in the next few days.


diff --git 
a/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt
b/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..7c5736e
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Title: Catalyst head changes
+Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org
+Content-Type: text/plain
+Posted: 2014-01-31
+Revision: 1
+News-Item-Format: 1.0
+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst
+
+After many years of stalled development, the catalyst repository is
+going to have major changes introduced to master in the next few days.
+The work done in the rewrite branch[1] by Brian Dolbec, is finally
+going to be merged into master through the pending branch[2].
+Anyone using catalyst to produce stages is advised to use the latest
+release (currently 2.0.16). If you need to track the stable branch,
+please use the catalyst 2.0. ebuild that tracks the 2.X branch.
+Anyone wanting to help with catalyst development and testing is
+encouraged to use the  version and report issues to the catalyst
+team, pending the understanding that master may be broken during the
+next few months.
+
+ [1] - 
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/catalyst.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/rewrite-on-master
+ [2] - 
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/catalyst.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pending


diff --git 
a/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt 
b/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt

new file mode 100644
index 000..0ea8a28
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+Title: Catalyst head changes
+Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org
+Content-Type: text/plain
+Posted: 2014-01-31
+Revision: 1
+News-Item-Format: 1.0
+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst
+
+After a long period on life support, the catalyst repository is
+going to have major changes introduced to master in the next few days.
+The work done in the rewrite branch[1] by Brian Dolbec, is finally
+going to be merged into master through the pending branch[2].
+Anyone using catalyst to produce stages is advised to use the latest
+release (currently 2.0.16). If you need to track the stable branch,
+please use the catalyst 2.0. ebuild that tracks the 2.X branch.
+Anyone wanting to help with catalyst development and testing is
+encouraged to use the  version and report issues to the catalyst
+team, pending the understanding that master may be broken during the
+next few months. Please report any issues to our bugzilla[3]. You
+can always find us in the #gentoo-releng irc channel of freenode.
+To be clear, these changes will only affect catalyst- and the
+master branch of the repository. If you're not using either, this
+doesn't affect you.
+
+ [1] - 
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/catalyst.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/rewrite-on-master
+ [2] - 
http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/catalyst.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pending
+ [3] - 
https://bugs.gentoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Gentoo%20Hosted%20Projects

+Component: Catalyst



Regards,

Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer





Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item - v2

2014-01-30 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:21:39PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
 +If you need to track the stable branch, please use the catalyst
 +2.0. ebuild that tracks the 2.X branch.

How about “If you want to track the stable 2.X branch, please use the
catalyst 2.0. ebuild.”?  Other than that minor tweak, it looks
good to me.  I'm agnostic on - audience restriction ;).

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item - v2

2014-01-30 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:57:36 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 04:21:39PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
 wrote:
  +If you need to track the stable branch, please use the catalyst
  +2.0. ebuild that tracks the 2.X branch.
 
 How about “If you want to track the stable 2.X branch, please use the
 catalyst 2.0. ebuild.”?  Other than that minor tweak, it looks
 good to me.  I'm agnostic on - audience restriction ;).
 
 Cheers,
 Trevor
 

Yeah, I agree, it looks good overall.  Just that one minor tweak



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-29 Thread W. Trevor King
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:14:53AM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
 +After many years of stalled development, the catalyst repository is
 +going to have major changes introduced to master in the next few days.

“the next few days” sounds a little optimistic to me ;).  “next few
months”, which you use later, seems more accurate here too.

 +report issues to the catalyst team,

This reads “catalyst@” to me, which is fine if that's what you indend.
However, you may want to suggest gentoo-catalyst@ instead, if you want
a wider net of possible responders.

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-29 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:14:53AM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:

+After many years of stalled development, the catalyst repository is
+going to have major changes introduced to master in the next few days.


?the next few days? sounds a little optimistic to me ;).  ?next few
months?, which you use later, seems more accurate here too.


In the next few days, master is going to be open again for work. It 
doesn't mean we're going to get immediate commits or that it will break 
the next day.
In the next few months, no one should expect master to work / build all 
the time.



+report issues to the catalyst team,


This reads ?catalyst@? to me, which is fine if that's what you indend.
However, you may want to suggest gentoo-catalyst@ instead, if you want
a wider net of possible responders.


I didn't use an email as I didn't mean to imply that the reports should be 
done by email. I expect we will prefer using bugzilla or poking us in 
#gentoo-releng, at least for quick status inquiries / updates.



Cheers,
Trevor


Regards,
Jorge.



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
 +Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst

Display-If-Installed: =dev-util/catalyst-



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-29 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Matt Turner wrote:


On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:

+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst


Display-If-Installed: =dev-util/catalyst-


Matt,

my plan was to show this to anyone using catalyst. I believe this news 
item is relevant and interesting for anyone using catalyst, but if others 
disagree, I can restrict it to only those using catalyst-.


Regards,

Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer



Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item

2014-01-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
 my plan was to show this to anyone using catalyst. I believe this news item
 is relevant and interesting for anyone using catalyst, but if others
 disagree, I can restrict it to only those using catalyst-.

The new is that the master branch may be unstable, which is only
relevant to people using the master branch.

*shrug*