Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-05 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:41:34PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: В Вск, 31/10/2010 в 16:38 +0200, Alex Alexander пишет: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Isn't this essentially what the default

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-02 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server - - ewarn

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-02 Thread Markos Chandras
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:23:36PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote: - - ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be - - ewarn a supported

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 31/10/2010 в 16:38 +0200, Alex Alexander пишет: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Isn't this essentially what the default profile is? Basically server is just default + USE=apache2 ldap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-11-01 Thread Markos Chandras
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:41:34PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: В Вск, 31/10/2010 в 16:38 +0200, Alex Alexander пишет: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Isn't this essentially what the default

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-31 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: If i remember it right, the server profile was created for those people, who only want a minimum amount of default profile enabled USE flags (so no desktop profile because of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-31 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: If i remember it right, the server profile was created for those people, who only want a minimum amount of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-31 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:38:09PM +0200, Alex Alexander wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: If i remember it right, the server profile was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-31 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: If i remember it right, the server profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-31 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:47:32PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 09:11 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-ldap, but still get ldap + pam working? Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-apache, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-30 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:05:17AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 09:11 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-ldap, but still get ldap + pam working?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-30 Thread Richard Freeman
On 10/30/2010 05:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:05:17AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 09:11 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Can I install a machine with the server profile and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-30 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 30.10.2010 03:37, schrieb Donnie Berkholz: On 15:46 Fri 29 Oct , Thomas Sachau wrote: Which raises the question, if those people, who want to install a minimal server will mostly use apache or something different. And especially for minimal setups, i dont think that apache will be the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files e.g $PORTDIR/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc It is more than obvious what this profile is for so I don't think this message makes any sense. ewarn This profile has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Markos Chandras
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:18:14PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 10/29/10 1:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files e.g $PORTDIR/default/linux/amd64/10.0/server/profile.bashrc It is more than obvious what this profile is for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/29/10 1:24 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 01:18:14PM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: ewarn This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not considered to be ewarn a supported server profile at this time. For a supported server If the above is no longer true

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. On 29-10-2010 11:03, Markos Chandras wrote: Hi I don't know how many of you are using these profiles. I would like to propose a couple of changes 1) I want to drop the warning message located on profile.bashrc files e.g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Petteri Räty
On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default IUSE -apache2 -ldap A minimal server installation does requires neither apache2 nor ldap Although one can install a server without apache or ldap, I'd say

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Markos Chandras
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:02:20PM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. On 29-10-2010 11:03, Markos Chandras wrote: Hi I don't know how many of you are using these profiles. I would like to propose a couple of changes 1) I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Thomas Sachau
Am 29.10.2010 14:13, schrieb Petteri Räty: On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default IUSE -apache2 -ldap A minimal server installation does requires neither apache2 nor ldap Although one can install

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Am 29.10.2010 14:13, schrieb Petteri Räty: On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: 2) Furthermore I would like to drop the following use flags from default IUSE -apache2 -ldap A minimal server

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Kfir Lavi
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Am 29.10.2010 14:13, schrieb Petteri Räty: On 29.10.2010 15.02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: 2) Furthermore I would like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Markos Chandras
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:11:33AM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: 'Anyone wanting to run a secure server profile should use hardened' tends to imply that the server profile is insecure which is probably not what you intend to convey to users. Hardened is likely more secure (which is all we can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/29/10 6:29 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: Furthermore the message about glibc-2.4 and gcc-4.1 looks rather obsolete. At least this part has to be removed/changed Fine for me. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in server profiles

2010-10-29 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:46 Fri 29 Oct , Thomas Sachau wrote: Which raises the question, if those people, who want to install a minimal server will mostly use apache or something different. And especially for minimal setups, i dont think that apache will be the first choice, so i agree with the removal of