Caleb Tennis wrote:
>> Latest list:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.
>> txt.20060315
>
> What's the search criteria? I fixed dev-ruby/ruby-gd yesterday, but it's
> still on the list. Perhaps, though, I didn't fix it correctly for the search
> scrip
> Latest list:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.
>txt.20060315
What's the search criteria? I fixed dev-ruby/ruby-gd yesterday, but it's
still on the list. Perhaps, though, I didn't fix it correctly for the search
script to pick up?
Caleb
--
gentoo
The last change: 187 to 135, over a couple of weeks. We're getting near
the goal of getting the entire tree fixed!
I'd like to literally have nothing in the tree unported to modular X, so
I don't need to add a virtual/x11-7.0 as a workaround to the problem.
Concentrate on unmaintained packages an
On 3/13/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> > On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Latest list:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224
> >
> > scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
> On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Latest list:
>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224
>
> scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is not in this list. Is your tool broken ?
No, it just checks the lat
On 2/24/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Latest list:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060224
scilab depend on virtual/x11 and is not in this list. Is your tool broken ?
Beber
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
The last change: 203 to 187, over 3 days -- that's 5 packages a day,
which is OK but ought to be better. Good job again, to those who have
been fixing games!
Anyone who would like to help, please start concentrating on
unmaintained packages. They make up close to half of the remaining
unported pac
The last change: 232 to 203, over 5.5 days -- that's 6 packages a day,
which is OK but ought to be better. Good job, to any who have been
fixing games! They dropped out of first place (sort of), porting 18
packages, followed by desktop-wm and video herds.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spy
The last change: 260 to 232, over 3 days -- that's 10 packages a day,
which is reasonable. Good job, to whoever's been fixing games! Again,
dropped by more than 10.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyd
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Herds and people with 5 or more unported packages, and change in # of
> packages:
>
> 69 games (-20)
> 51 none (individual or no maintainer) (-6)
> 28 (no metadata.xml) (-2)
> 16 desktop-wm (-13)
> 14 video (-0)
> 11 cjk (-11)
> 7 afters
The last change: 320 to 260, over 5 days -- that's 12 packages a day,
which is reasonable. Props to Josh_B, games, desktop-wm and cjk herds
for fixing 10+ packages.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyd
The last change: 329 to 320, over 3.5 days -- not so hot.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060207
Herds and people with 5 or more unported pack
Hi
I took the time to update the ebuild for gnusim8085 :) I created bug #121544 and I uploaded a .patch (diffed against the latest ebuild in the portage
tree).
Even before I got to add the dependency to the modular xorg-x11 bug, withing a matter of seconds someone already added the dependency
The last change: 343 to 329 -- pretty decent, but I'd like to see about
1.5-2x this rate. Pretty soon I'll have to change the list of the worst
offenders to the top 10 instead of 10 packages, because the number of
actual herds is getting pretty small.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spydero
060202 Philip Webb wrote:
> Today's graph seems itself broken, as it goes up slightly at the R end.
> Perhaps you could add numbers down the R-hand side for easy reading ?
Thanks for fixing it !
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//__
Works for me.
On 2/3/06, Jason Wever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Latest list:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202
>
> Returns a 404
>
> --
> Jason Wever
>
Jason Wever wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry guys, forgot to actually upload the data. =)
Both problems should be fixed now.
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:39:15 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Latest list:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060202
Returns a 404
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
060202 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> The last change: 406 to 343 -- nice! Progress graph:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Today's graph seems itself broken, as it goes up slightly at the R end.
Perhaps you could add numbers down the R-hand side for easy
The last change: 406 to 343 -- nice! Much of that came from the hard
work of nelchael in desktop-dock.
So, what do we see? The top offenders also didn't get much fixed, with
the exception of desktop-dock (54 packages fixed since Jan 31!) and the
sci herd (6 fixed). That just leaves 3 packages fixe
The last change: 401 up to 406. Yes, it actually got worse. This is
caused by artifacts fixed by the recent portage 2.1 revision bump,
because I know some apps were fixed.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.or
The last drop: 465 to 401, a change of 64 in 1.5 days -- pretty solid!
Lots of work done by Josh_B in the games categories, and misc. work by
others, as well.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/
The last drop: 498 to 465, a change of 33 -- adequate, but should be
better since this was for close to three days.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.
On 1/26/06, Matthijs van der Vleuten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/26/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yesterday's drop: 513 to 498, a change of 15 -- adequate, but should be
> > better.
>
> Your previous status mail said 783. This would rather be a change of 285 :-)
I think
On 1/26/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday's drop: 513 to 498, a change of 15 -- adequate, but should be
> better.
Your previous status mail said 783. This would rather be a change of 285 :-)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
First, a huge thanks to Robin, who pythonized my bash scripts and
reduced the time of a run from more than an hour and a half to less than
30 minutes.
Yesterday's drop: 513 to 498, a change of 15 -- adequate, but should be
better.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/br
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Yesterday's drop: 867 to 783, pretty solid. But with the new check for
"true" deps instead of anything in the dep tree, it's down to 513.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderou
Yesterday's drop: 871 to 867, a whopping 4. We need to do better than
this! We're in the home stretch.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060122
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Yesterday's drop: 17 to 871. Not as impressive as Saturday, but not bad.
Sorry, that's 917. So it dropped by 36.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Yesterday's drop: 17 to 871. Not as impressive as Saturday, but not bad.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060122
Herds and individuals with 10
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 15:32 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> 196 games
We know that we have a *lot* of packages to fix on this. I'm working on
it in my spare time between doing release building. Anyway, I did
manage to get about 8 ported, thanks to a single user posting lots of
patches.
Any
You definitely made up for Thursday's performance yesterday by dropping
the number of unported packages from 1003 to 917.
I've posted a graph of our progress [1]. Keep up the good work of the
past day, and the tree will be in great shape in time for modular X to
enter ~arch.
Latest list:
http://d
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Today's update.. down to 1012 packages.
Yesterday was pretty weak, only 9 packages got ported. We're at 1003 now.
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.txt.20060120
Documentation:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/
On Thursday 19 January 2006 22:27, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > Would you considder putting these daily updates on your devspace
> > instead of sending a huge email daily?
>
> Nope. That puts the effort on these developers who haven't ported apps
> to actually go to my webspace a
Alec Warner wrote:
Did you find another way to do those deps then? We haven't released
2.0.54 with that fixed yet...
The drivers will continue to require manual emerging in ~arch until a
fixed portage comes out, and the migration guide continues to document
and support that method.
Thanks,
Do
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Would you considder putting these daily updates on your devspace
instead of sending a huge email daily?
Nope. That puts the effort on these developers who haven't ported apps
to actually go to my webspace and search around.
On re-reading what you said, I could post a link to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Lares Moreau wrote:
>
>> Could you post updates once a week(or two), similar to what [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> does with the aging ebuilds. I don't feel a play-by-play is necessary.
>
>
> I will be posting daily updates until it
On 1/19/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lares Moreau wrote:
> > Could you post updates once a week(or two), similar to what [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]
> > does with the aging ebuilds. I don't feel a play-by-play is necessary.
>
> I will be posting daily updates until it goes into ~arc
Lares Moreau wrote:
Could you post updates once a week(or two), similar to what [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does with the aging ebuilds. I don't feel a play-by-play is necessary.
I will be posting daily updates until it goes into ~arch, planned for
Jan. 25.
Thanks,
Donnie
signature.asc
Description: O
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 08:28 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > OK, I've got this fixed. Suddenly there are 1037 unported apps instead
> > of 500! How exciting.
>
> Today's update.. down to 1012 packages.
Great.
Could you post updates once a week(or two), similar to what [
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
OK, I've got this fixed. Suddenly there are 1037 unported apps instead
of 500! How exciting.
Today's update.. down to 1012 packages.
Donnie
app-accessibility/brltty accessibility dmwaters
app-accessibility/dasher gnome-accessibility none
app-accessibility/gnome-mag gnome
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
My current script seems to miss some things. The reason this happens is
that the group of applications they're emerged in also contains some app
that breaks the emerge, perhaps because it's in package.mask or isn't
keyworded at least ~x86. Broken emerges don't get far enoug
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I hacked together a script this afternoon to find any packages that are
not yet ported to modular X. It will only work on systems _with modular
X installed_. This is because it works by using emerge to check for
blockers, then resolving those blockers down to a single packa
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
dev-php/PECL-imagick php none
This package only has
DEPEND="${DEPEND} >=media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.0.0"
listed as its dependencies.
Ah, yes. It will also catch whether anything in the dependency tree of
any app is broken, not just t
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> dev-php/PECL-imagick php none
This package only has
DEPEND="${DEPEND} >=media-gfx/graphicsmagick-1.0.0"
listed as its dependencies.
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0E5B
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
And here's a list, with herds and maintainers, of a loop across each
category in PORTDIR. This should be a fairly comprehensive list of every
app not yet ported.
Today's update, synced as of about an hour ago, along with the script to
generate everything if you want to do
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I hacked together a script this afternoon to find any packages that are
not yet ported to modular X. It will only work on systems _with modular
X installed_. This is because it works by using emerge to check for
blockers, then resolving those blocke
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I hacked together a script this afternoon to find any packages that are
not yet ported to modular X. It will only work on systems _with modular
X installed_. This is because it works by using emerge to check for
blockers, then resolving those blockers down to a single packa
48 matches
Mail list logo
