Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 12/24/2016 05:13 PM, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > On 11/04/2016 09:36 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI and HOMEPAGE variables. >> >>> It would probably be better if the output included the >>> maintainer. >> >> Yes, that is a good idea.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 11/04/2016 09:36 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: >>> If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI >>> and HOMEPAGE variables. > >> It would probably be better if the output included the >> maintainer. > > Yes, that is a good idea. > > cat googlecode-shutdown.txt | cut -f1 -d":" |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

Ühel kenal päeval, L, 24.12.2016 kell 02:29, kirjutas Raymond Jennings: > I hope this isn't a stupid question...but can we safely assume that > all such google code SRC_URI's have *already* been mirrored? > > If I understand the mirrors correctly, they serve as a sort of cache > of sorts of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

I hope this isn't a stupid question...but can we safely assume that all such google code SRC_URI's have *already* been mirrored? If I understand the mirrors correctly, they serve as a sort of cache of sorts of upstream distfile sources. Is there such a thing as a "cache miss" that could lead to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2016, 23:57:10 schrieb Jonas Stein: > > The shutdown is in two weeks. > One can see clearly a drop of broken ebuilds after the first mail on the > mailinglist and after the personal mail on 2016-11-24. [1] Thank you all >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:57:10 +0100 Jonas Stein wrote: > The shutdown is in two weeks. > One can see clearly a drop of broken ebuilds after the first mail on the > mailinglist and after the personal mail on 2016-11-24. [1] Thank you all > for fixing so many ebuilds already. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

Jonas Stein: > On 2016-11-05 08:47, Michał Górny wrote: >> Thou shalt not rely on the mirrors! Though mirrors as a temporary >> solution are acceptable. As long as you don't turn it into 'wrong >> SRC_URI is fine, the file is on the mirrors'. > >> Also, it would be nice not to have the berlios ->

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 2016-11-05 08:47, Michał Górny wrote: > Thou shalt not rely on the mirrors! Though mirrors as a temporary > solution are acceptable. As long as you don't turn it into 'wrong > SRC_URI is fine, the file is on the mirrors'. > Also, it would be nice not to have the berlios -> sourceforge crap >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

>> Today we have still 524 ebuilds with SRC_URI=*googlecode* in the tree >> [2] and should get these fixed before end of 2016. > > Thanks! > > I suggest adding repoman check for those ebuilds > if it does not already exist. It will allow users spot > ticking bombs in their overlays. Sergei,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 05:45:06PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > dev-python/google-api-python-client-1.1: robbat2gentoo.org > net-nds/nsscache-0.23*: robbat2gentoo.org Old ebuilds removed. > dev-vcs/git-2*: robbat2gentoo.org polynomial-cgentoo.org gcode was already a backup to the other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 00:54:25 +0100 Jonas Stein wrote: > Dear all, > > Google announced in 2015 to close the "Google Code" repositories [1]. > > They will provide the repositories in read only state till end of 2016. > > Today we have still 524 ebuilds with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 08:38:22 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 05/11/2016 00:54, Jonas Stein wrote: > > Today we have still 524 ebuilds with SRC_URI=*googlecode* in the tree > > [2] and should get these fixed before end of 2016. > > > > [3]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 05/11/2016 00:54, Jonas Stein wrote: > Today we have still 524 ebuilds with SRC_URI=*googlecode* in the tree > [2] and should get these fixed before end of 2016. > > [3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Shutdown_of_google_code The wiki page seems to indicate some sense of urgency. I'm not sure

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 05/11/16 04:45, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 23:09:07 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: >> [...] >>> >> [...] >>> Yes, that is a good idea. >>> >>> cat googlecode-shutdown.txt | cut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 23:09:07 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: > [...] > > > [...] > > > > Yes, that is a good idea. > > > > cat googlecode-shutdown.txt | cut -f1 -d":" | xargs equery meta -mH | > > grep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: >>> If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI and >>> HOMEPAGE variables. > >> It would probably be better if the output included the maintainer. > > Yes, that is a good idea. > > cat googlecode-shutdown.txt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

>> If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI and >> HOMEPAGE variables. > It would probably be better if the output included the maintainer. Yes, that is a good idea. cat googlecode-shutdown.txt | cut -f1 -d":" | xargs equery meta -mH | grep "\@" | sort | uniq | sed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 05/11/16 01:20, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:30 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> Apologies, getting ahead of myself here .. there must be a portage >> utility, but I've forgotten which one interrogates metadata .. I'll >> defer to a more authoritative source

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

> Apologies, getting ahead of myself here .. there must be a portage > utility, but I've forgotten which one interrogates metadata .. I'll > defer to a more authoritative source ... You can try to fetch the maintainers per package with equery meta -mH foo/bar Best, -- Jonas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:30 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > Apologies, getting ahead of myself here .. there must be a portage > utility, but I've forgotten which one interrogates metadata .. I'll > defer to a more authoritative source ... > There might be a command line utility

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 05/11/16 00:23, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 05/11/16 00:20, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: >>> If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI and >>> HOMEPAGE variables. >>> >> It would probably be better if the output

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On 05/11/16 00:20, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: >> If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI and >> HOMEPAGE variables. >> > It would probably be better if the output included the maintainer. > Hopefully this isn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Code shutdown requires 524 ebuilds to be fixed before end of 2016

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Jonas Stein wrote: > > If you maintain one of these packages, please fix the SRC_URI and > HOMEPAGE variables. > It would probably be better if the output included the maintainer. Hopefully this isn't using anything deprecated, but you should be