Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
On 27/08/2020 12:37, Max Magorsch wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier wrote: >> Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ? >> It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling >> those manually for some time now ;) >> > > I think we could use the remoteid in future to improve the repology > warnings. However, I am not fully convinced that we can completely > replace the repology check using the remoteid, as a simple grep shows, > that currently 9873 packages contain at least one remote id. That's > just half of our packages in the tree. So I could imagine that we do > use the remoteid whenever it is available and otherwise fall back on > the repology data. However, for this to work we would need to things > imo: > > 1) Get the latest version available given the remoteid > 2) Compare the latest version available with our latest version > > It's especially the second part that I think is not done that quickly. > However, if anyone is interested in coming up with some logic / code > for this, any contributions are highly welcome. > Another cool addition, thanks :) While we're on the topic of remoteid, could you please add links for those somewhere in the package page? I opened a bug for this a long time ago and I think it would be a nice addition to the HOMEPAGE URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/657018 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
On 2020-08-26 20:57, Max Magorsch wrote: > To avoid these false warnings it's now possible to filter the repology > checks. No more false warnings due to Repology not understanding the Gentoo Perl version scheme? Yes please! Thank you *very* much for this feature, and in case I haven't said it yet for all your work on packages.g.o in the first place. On a related note, how hard would it in your opinion be to implement the handling of said Perl versioning scheme? In this particular case querying remote-IDs instead of / addition to Repology will not help because it's the difference between Gentoo and upstream. -- Marecki signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier wrote: > Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ? > It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling > those manually for some time now ;) > I think we could use the remoteid in future to improve the repology warnings. However, I am not fully convinced that we can completely replace the repology check using the remoteid, as a simple grep shows, that currently 9873 packages contain at least one remote id. That's just half of our packages in the tree. So I could imagine that we do use the remoteid whenever it is available and otherwise fall back on the repology data. However, for this to work we would need to things imo: 1) Get the latest version available given the remoteid 2) Compare the latest version available with our latest version It's especially the second part that I think is not done that quickly. However, if anyone is interested in coming up with some logic / code for this, any contributions are highly welcome.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:00 PM Nils Freydank wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks for the work around p.g.o! I'd directly like to use your opt out for a > package I maintain in proxied mode: > > The following changes since commit b1e0b4c9ec76049631cbb0a2d3798adbce2075ac: > > Ignore net-misc/dropbox::void_x86_64 for repology (2020-08-26 19:14:45 > +0200) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > https://git.holgersson.xyz/gentoo-related/soko-metadata ignore-mktorrent > > for you to fetch changes up to dd823eaaf3f4893b24130360c7ec1c7f22f8b39b: > > Ignore net-p2p/mktorrent for repology (2020-08-27 11:45:34 +0200) > Great, thank you! I've just added net-p2p/mktorrent to the ignore list and the warning should have gone on packages.g.o now.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:57 +, Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > Good news regarding packages.g.o! > > While the new packages.g.o version went into production some time > ago, > this also led to some false warnings about outdated package versions. > This is because we currently take information about outdated package > versions from repology.org, which are not always accurate. > Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ? It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling those manually for some time now ;) Alexis
Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
Hi, thanks for the work around p.g.o! I'd directly like to use your opt out for a package I maintain in proxied mode: The following changes since commit b1e0b4c9ec76049631cbb0a2d3798adbce2075ac: Ignore net-misc/dropbox::void_x86_64 for repology (2020-08-26 19:14:45 +0200) are available in the Git repository at: https://git.holgersson.xyz/gentoo-related/soko-metadata ignore-mktorrent for you to fetch changes up to dd823eaaf3f4893b24130360c7ec1c7f22f8b39b: Ignore net-p2p/mktorrent for repology (2020-08-27 11:45:34 +0200) Nils Freydank (1): Ignore net-p2p/mktorrent for repology repology/ignored-packages | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) -- regards, Nils signature.asc Description: PGP signature
