Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-02 Thread Michael Mol
On Thursday, December 01, 2016 10:13:17 PM Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: [snip] > > Thanks for bringing this to attention. It's somewhat related to another > > discussion we've been having about copyright, and it may be worth > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 12/01/2016 02:13 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> I completely agree that we should credit (and thank) contributors. I'm >> not sure if I'm doing things correctly, but when I'm dealing with a bug >> and users contribute patches or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Andrey Utkin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I completely agree that we should credit (and thank) contributors. I'm > not sure if I'm doing things correctly, but when I'm dealing with a bug > and users contribute patches or edits to ebuilds, I try to credit them > in my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 11/30/2016 01:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: > I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody, > but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue > is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list > seems retired anyway. > > This is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Andrey Utkin
Hi Matthew, Please take my deepest excuses for unjustly blaming you, now I see that my perception was plain wrong in being so blindly emotional. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:43:36PM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: > While I did see your PR and bug if I remember correctly I didn't > actually use your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread james
On 11/30/2016 05:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and relationships. Of course

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:23:56 PM EST Andrey Utkin wrote: > I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody, > but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue > is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list > seems

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Andrey Utkin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:27:17AM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > One more reason to use merge commits for pull requests: original > author commits with proper authorship will be retained. > > Yes, I know that some people are unhappy with non-linear history, > but this is how git works, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Matthew Thode
On 11/30/2016 03:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: > I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody, > but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue > is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list > seems retired anyway. > > This is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:17:16 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin > wrote: > > > > I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just > > about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Sam Jorna
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:23:56PM +, Andrey Utkin wrote: > The difference between my submission and final variant by Matthew is big > in number of lines, but is trivial in content as you can see below, so I > don't believe that Matthew has written his variant from scratch on his > own (he

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 30.11.2016 kell 21:23, kirjutas Andrey Utkin: > My PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/2765 > > My bugzilla ticket linked to it: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599088 > > After my pull request from Nov 6, the following commit gets into > mainline: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: > > I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just > about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and > relationships. Of course inexperienced contributor gets things not