Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-08-06 Thread Dan Armak
On Friday 05 August 2005 12:34, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote: base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today, if patching fails the process

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 29 July 2005 15:56, Dan Armak wrote: base.eclass (which inherited by many other eclasses) has an src_unpack supporting patching from patchfiles listed in $PATCHES. However, today, if patching fails the process doesn't abort. Why can't we just use epatch? -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed change to base.eclass: patch || die

2005-07-29 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 29 July 2005 16:05, Dan Armak wrote: Anyway, the effective change would be to die if patching fails (and support patchlevels != 0), so my orig question stands. epatch already takes care of failing, that's why I was thinking about that :) -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò Gentoo Developer -