Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-27 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-08-18 14:05, Joonas Niilola wrote: > I'm suggesting of adding a new metadata flag to our Wiki's > User:/Project: page which then prints a message to this page saying > whether the maintainer (be it project or user), "accepts" or "deals > with" Github contributions. The wording can be a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-26 Thread Adam Feldman
On 8/18/20 8:05 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, >   https://packages.gentoo.org/ > > and the new maintainer pages in it, >   https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainers > > If you open a maintainer page, >  

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > Read: it's important to slap users to satisfy developer's wannabes. LOL! Michał, you managed to squeeze both misrepresentation and ad hominem into so few words. Please take care. Anyway, you missed my point: It's important that (the project) developers set accurate

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +, Peter Stuge wrote: >> I think this is a very good feature. >> >> If I ever do become a proper Gentoo developer I will certainly not >> spend any time on anything to do with GitHub, and in my current >> position

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread David Seifert
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:06 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:58 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:48 AM Michał Górny > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > > > some of you may already

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 8/18/20 8:52 PM, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > is there a way or would it be possible to get notified on pull > requests that are relevant to me? though i get notifications from > github, i get tens to hundreds daily and most of them are irrelevant > to me so searching for those few that are related

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 18. 08. 20 v 19:06 Joonas Niilola napsal(a): On 8/18/20 7:30 PM, Miroslav Šulc wrote: hi, how would be handled cases where you and me agreed that you will take care of pull requests on behalf of sound@ and proaudio@? and what if a package is maintained by multiple maintainers or even some

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 18. 08. 20 v 19:10 Joonas Niilola napsal(a): On 8/18/20 8:06 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: So I think it's just simplest to enable it per-user per-project basis. We can all edit Project: pages, toggling the flag. If you're willing to look and merge sound@ PRs, you enable it for Sound project.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 8/18/20 8:06 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > So I think it's just simplest to enable it per-user per-project basis. > We can all edit Project: pages, toggling the flag. If you're willing to > look and merge sound@ PRs, you enable it for Sound project. However this > might cause a problem when a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 8/18/20 7:30 PM, Miroslav Šulc wrote: > hi, > > how would be handled cases where you and me agreed that you will take > care of pull requests on behalf of sound@ and proaudio@? and what if a > package is maintained by multiple maintainers or even some maintainers > and a project, each with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi, how would be handled cases where you and me agreed that you will take care of pull requests on behalf of sound@ and proaudio@? and what if a package is maintained by multiple maintainers or even some maintainers and a project, each with a different preference? how that would be solved to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:58 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:48 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +, Peter Stuge wrote: > > > Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:05 AM Joonas Niilola wrote: > > Hey, > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, > https://packages.gentoo.org/ > > and the new maintainer pages in it, > https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainers > > If you open a maintainer page, >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:48 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +, Peter Stuge wrote: > > Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, > > > https://packages.gentoo.org/ > > > > I had not seen that - that's wonderful! >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 15:36 +, Peter Stuge wrote: > Joonas Niilola wrote: > > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, > > https://packages.gentoo.org/ > > I had not seen that - that's wonderful! > > I would just request that /packages/ is removed from the start

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Peter Stuge
Joonas Niilola wrote: > some of you may already have seen the new packages.gentoo.org page, >   https://packages.gentoo.org/ I had not seen that - that's wonderful! I would just request that /packages/ is removed from the start of package URLs. I understand how this makes request routing more