On Sunday 29 November 2009 13:46:59 Dominik Kapusta wrote:
Hello guys!
We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree.
The qt4-r2 eclass is meant to help with ebuilds for Qt-based (qmake-based,
to be precise) applications.
The eclass is attached, and here's a short
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:54:30 Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:46:59PM +0200, Dominik Kapusta wrote:
Hello guys!
We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree.
The qt4-r2 eclass is meant to help with ebuilds for Qt-based
(qmake-based, to be
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:29:51 Dominik Kapusta wrote:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 15:54:30 Thomas Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:46:59PM +0200, Dominik Kapusta wrote:
Hello guys!
We, the Qt team, would like to include a new eclass in the tree.
The qt4-r2 eclass is
2009/11/29 Thomas Anderson tander...@gentoo.org:
I can see people using qt4-r2 just because it has -r2 (so it is newer
than qt4)
That is exactly the intended behaviour. We would break the tree if we would
simply add the new functionality to the existing qt4.eclass. And in absence
of an eclass
2009/11/29 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:59:10 Ben de Groot wrote:
As soon as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the old
qt4.eclass will be removed.
As far as i remember we don't remove eclasses. Probably you meant deprecated,
but not
On Monday 30 November 2009 00:19:49 Ben de Groot wrote:
2009/11/29 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:59:10 Ben de Groot wrote:
As soon as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the
old qt4.eclass will be removed.
As far as i remember we
Dne neděle 29 Listopad 2009 23:11:23 Dawid Węgliński napsal(a):
On Sunday 29 November 2009 16:59:10 Ben de Groot wrote:
As soon as existing ebuilds in the tree are ported over to qt4-r2, the
old qt4.eclass will
be removed.
As far as i remember we don't remove eclasses. Probably you meant
