> On Sat, 16 Apr 2022, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>> edobe() {
> nit: I'd personally would use 'edob', as shorter is sometimes better
> plus every begin needs an end, so no need to explicitly state that
> there is an end.
It's even more obscure as a name however. :)
>> ebegin "Running $@"
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 06:48:56AM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 12:23:18PM +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > > ebegin "Running $@"
> > > "$@"
> > > eend $? || die -n "$@ failed" > return $?
> >
> > I think this return statement can be omitted since it
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 12:23:18PM +0200, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > ebegin "Running $@"
> > "$@"
> > eend $? || die -n "$@ failed" > return $?
>
> I think this return statement can be omitted since it will always be
> invoked with 0 as argument, and this is the default
On 16/04/2022 10.38, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022, Sam James wrote:
+# @FUNCTION: edo
Just a remark: A similar command existed a long time ago under the
name "try". [1]
It was executed under "env" [2], should we also do that?
+# @USAGE: command [arg1 [arg2 ...]]
should be
