On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:23 -0500, Kito wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2005, at 12:07 PM, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
> > I managed to get it to work once I made some dirty hacks to account
> > for
> > uname being different, and removing dependencies on /proc... once
> > inside
> > the chroot, it's Linux a
On Aug 15, 2005, at 12:07 PM, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I managed to get it to work once I made some dirty hacks to account
for
uname being different, and removing dependencies on /proc... once
inside
the chroot, it's Linux anyway, so none of the BSDism's are an issue.
Ok, let me know if yo
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:16 -0500, Kito wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Grobian wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >
> >> By the way, I am working to get catalyst running on OSX, so
> >> version 2.0
> >> will definite suit your needs when it is released.
>
> Very cool. I had
On Aug 15, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Grobian wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
By the way, I am working to get catalyst running on OSX, so
version 2.0
will definite suit your needs when it is released.
Very cool. I had 1.x nearly working a while back...haven't looked at
2.0 yet.
If you ne
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
By the way, I am working to get catalyst running on OSX, so version 2.0
will definite suit your needs when it is released.
If you need help on OSX specific things, be sure to contact us...
--
Fabian Groffen
eBuild && Porting
Gentoo for Mac OS X
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.o
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 14:22 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> multiple instances on a 128-node x86 cluster (1/node). There are one or
> two things I'd like to change in Catalyst, as they currently make it
> slightly dangerous for your system. If for some reason an ebuild goes
> wrong, the bind mount
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 09:00:19AM -0500, Kito wrote:
> Adding -dev to CC: in case someone has any meaningful input or has
> already tackled this problem...
We do already have an application capable of doing tinderboxing for
packages. It's one of the abilities of Catalyst.
So all you would need
