On Tuesday 05 September 2006 05:38, Luis Medinas wrote:
Now the license problems are fixed and we can ship this on our portage
tree tarballs for our new releases etc...
Err, I think the problem was for binpkg, we could already ship cdrtools on the
portage tree tarballs... ebuilds are GPL2.
--
On Monday 04 September 2006 23:38, Luis Medinas wrote:
Now the license problems are fixed and we can ship this on our portage
tree tarballs for our new releases etc...
there was/is no problem beyond our livecds/binpkgs
-mike
pgp59LxF6Qaup.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Luis Medinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/09/05 04:38 +0100]:
The package is in the tree and it's asking for testing before i can
remove it from pkg.mask and provide the cdrtools virtual.
Now, cdrkit is in the tree. Furthermore I added
cdrtools-2.01.01a08 to the tree. That's the latest GPLed
Luis Medinas wrote:
Now i know the real story since i've been talking with Debian
Maintainers. So there's isn't anything to say but we are working close
to upstream and they actually offer commit access to maintainers of
another distros. Cdrkit project sounds much more like an open project
On Friday 01 September 2006 14:51, Lars Weiler wrote:
We have a lot of other applications in the tree, which is
not free.
The problem is not that it's not free*, but that linking GPL and CDDL code
violates the GPL. If the whole cdrtools code were CDDL, there were no
problem.
*The OSI
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 15:24 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Friday 01 September 2006 14:51, Lars Weiler wrote:
We have a lot of other applications in the tree, which is
not free.
The problem is not that it's not free*, but that linking GPL and CDDL code
violates the GPL. If the whole
On Friday 01 September 2006 15:45, Luis Medinas wrote:
I'm sure that situation will be fixed by the upstream (Jörg) since it
violates GPL license. About the debian fork we will take a look at it
and see where's going.
Read the Debian bug. Jörg Schilling is badmouthing Debian developers and
