Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 26/06/2011 в 17:20 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: I never understood the reason after keeping deps not sorted alphabetically where order doesn't matter - it's like someone purposely made ebuild harder to read - it's counter productive. Like with perl modules with well written

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 25/06/2011 в 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? There's no rule, but we should

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 08:02:03 Peter Volkov wrote: В Сбт, 25/06/2011 в 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:51:53 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat,

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Saturday 25 of June 2011 22:32:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: On 25-06-2011 14:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? There's no

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday 25 of June 2011 22:32:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: *DEPEND=       !X-2.0       !Y       A       B       ...       Z       a? ( X )       b? ( Y )       c? (               J               K

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented?

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Dale
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-26 Thread Kent Fredric
On 27 June 2011 03:20, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: I personally prefer tabs, but I also like using EAPI=version, sorting everything alphabetically and even use the following depend blocks: *DEPEND=       !X-2.0       !Y       A       B       ...       Z       a? ( X )    

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — indentation should be with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? There's no rule, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml

2011-06-25 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25-06-2011 14:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote: Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be indented? Tabs or n spaces? There's no rule, but we should follow