Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization Detached from Security Bugs

2021-08-27 Thread John Helmert III
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 08:58:35AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 19:11 -0500, John Helmert III wrote:
> > In the past, stabilization for security bugs would be handled directly
> > in that security bug. After some discussion on the gentoo-dev mailing
> > list [1], there was some consensus on modifying this workflow to
> > separate stabilization from security bugs. Going forward, separate bugs
> > should be filed for security stabilizations and then the security bug
> > will have a dependency on its stabilization bug.
> 
> Great!  I can make the field invisible on security bugs when you've
> confirmed that all pending stabilizations are finished.  Or without
> that, if you prefer ;-).

Sure! But let's at least wait until we're done with the pending security
bugs which have CC-ARCHES [1], just to keep churn (and work for us)
a bit lower.

[1] 
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?email1=security%40gentoo.org_to1=1=substring=keywords_id=5758333=substring_format=advanced=---=CC-ARCHES


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization Detached from Security Bugs

2021-08-27 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 2021-08-26 at 19:11 -0500, John Helmert III wrote:
> In the past, stabilization for security bugs would be handled directly
> in that security bug. After some discussion on the gentoo-dev mailing
> list [1], there was some consensus on modifying this workflow to
> separate stabilization from security bugs. Going forward, separate bugs
> should be filed for security stabilizations and then the security bug
> will have a dependency on its stabilization bug.

Great!  I can make the field invisible on security bugs when you've
confirmed that all pending stabilizations are finished.  Or without
that, if you prefer ;-).

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny





Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilization Detached from Security Bugs

2021-08-26 Thread Matt Turner
\o/