Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2006-01-03 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:56:03PM +0530, Shyam Mani wrote:
 [2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/modular-x-howto.xml

You mean:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml
right?

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2006-01-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greg KH wrote:
| On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 01:56:03PM +0530, Shyam Mani wrote:
|
|[2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/modular-x-howto.xml
|
|
| You mean:
|   http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/modular-x-howto.xml
| right?

Yeah we decided to move it to within the desktop project. Thanks for
pointing this out.

Thanks,
Donnie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDuzOHXVaO67S1rtsRAhq1AJ4lk4D/OZ0REuBywJbpzr6xiV8BdACfdKcn
uOd7fYtD/wR4LMLggze8G+M=
=afP7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2006-01-02 Thread Shyam Mani
John Myers wrote:

 Here's one I smashed together just now:

Thanks, this is now up at [1] and [2]. I just made a few minor changes.

[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/?catid=upgrade
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/modular-x-howto.xml

Regards,

-- 
Shyam Mani | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
docs-team  | http://gdp.gentoo.org
GPG key| 0xFDD0E345


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-24 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 00:49:35 +0100, Joshua Baergen wrote:

 As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping 
 the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many 
 changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2.  Over the next few weeks we'll be 
 finalizing licenses and other necessities.  To whoever has been using 
 modular for awhile: please let us know of any issues you currently have, 
 or had during upgrading.

Hi,

I'm not totally sure this is related to 7.0 but I had the issue after
the emerge -u world that had 7.0 : it seems rgb.txt has been moved, from
a place I can't remember now (most probably /usr/X11R6/rgb.txt) to
/usr/share/X11/rgb.txt.
I just had to update xorg.conf, but having white showing up as pink and
not being able to launch any term was a surprise at first :)

Thanks for your great work with modular X!

Regards,
Alexandre
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-24 Thread Peter Cech
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:31:25AM +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 00:49:35 +0100, Joshua Baergen wrote:
 
  As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping 
  the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many 
  changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2.  Over the next few weeks we'll be 
  finalizing licenses and other necessities.  To whoever has been using 
  modular for awhile: please let us know of any issues you currently have, 
  or had during upgrading.
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm not totally sure this is related to 7.0 but I had the issue after
 the emerge -u world that had 7.0 : it seems rgb.txt has been moved, from
 a place I can't remember now (most probably /usr/X11R6/rgb.txt) to
 /usr/share/X11/rgb.txt.
 I just had to update xorg.conf, but having white showing up as pink and
 not being able to launch any term was a surprise at first :)

I also got problems with the path to rgb.txt. In my case, the
consequences were less dramatic: xmms looked very ugly and all tcl/tk
applications failed to run (error was something about being unable to
run application Black).

I solved my problems by commenting RgbPath setting in xorg.conf. I would
suggest the line with RgbPath is commented in xorg.conf.example.

Regards,
Peter Cech
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-24 Thread Joshua Baergen

Peter Cech wrote:

I solved my problems by commenting RgbPath setting in xorg.conf. I would
suggest the line with RgbPath is commented in xorg.conf.example.
  
While I'll respond here, it's generally better to post these sorts of 
issues on bugs.gentoo.org (searching first!), as they don't really 
belong on this list and no doubt others will have the same issues.


From the xorg-x11 metabuild:

   # Filter out ModulePath line since it often holds a now-invalid path
   # Bug #112924
   # For RC3 - filter out RgbPath line since it also seems to break 
things

   some excluded code that does just that

After merging xorg-x11, running etc-update will rid your xorg.conf of 
these lines.  This functionality has been around for a month or so in 
the ebuild iirc.


I believe that xorg.conf.sample is not provided by 7.0 currently, so 
you're probably looking at a 6.8.x version.


--
Joshua Baergen

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-23 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
 As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping 
 the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many 
 changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2.  Over the next few weeks we'll be 
 finalizing licenses and other necessities.  To whoever has been using 
 modular for awhile: please let us know of any issues you currently have, 
 or had during upgrading.

For those of us who want to try modular now, where's the pointer to how
to do this (I can't seem to find it in the archives, sorry...)

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-23 Thread Dan Meltzer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/xorg-x11/migrating_to_modular_x_howto.txt

followed it this morning :)
On 12/23/05, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Joshua Baergen wrote:
  As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping
  the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many
  changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2.  Over the next few weeks we'll be
  finalizing licenses and other necessities.  To whoever has been using
  modular for awhile: please let us know of any issues you currently have,
  or had during upgrading.

 For those of us who want to try modular now, where's the pointer to how
 to do this (I can't seem to find it in the archives, sorry...)

 thanks,

 greg k-h
 --
 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-23 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Friday 23 December 2005 23:50, Greg KH wrote:
 For those of us who want to try modular now, where's the pointer to how
 to do this (I can't seem to find it in the archives, sorry...)
google for spyderous migrating guide site:dev.gentoo.org :)

-- 
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE


pgpH9bqK3ieCW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-23 Thread Donnie Berkholz

Greg KH wrote:

For those of us who want to try modular now, where's the pointer to how
to do this (I can't seem to find it in the archives, sorry...)


I've been meaning to get it into guidexml and make it a real project doc 
for a while now (and the accompanying porting guide), but haven't had 
time. Anybody who wants to help out by doing this is quite welcome to do so.


I'm taking off for a week, so Josh will be taking care of your X.

Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2005-12-23 Thread Donnie Berkholz

Joshua Baergen wrote:
As many of you no doubt have noticed, spyderous and I finished bumping 
the modular packages to the newly released 7.0, which includes many 
changes and bug fixes since 6.8.2.  Over the next few weeks we'll be 
finalizing licenses and other necessities.  To whoever has been using 
modular for awhile: please let us know of any issues you currently have, 
or had during upgrading.


What's this mean for everybody who maintains X-using applications? Well, 
7.0 will probably come out of package.mask in a month at most, so that's 
how long you have to either get your apps ported or suffer with them 
being broken on ~arch systems.


That's the stick end of this; I provided the carrot a while back and 
didn't get many takers.


Thanks,
Donnie
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list