Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-23 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
17.02.2016 21:32, Denis Dupeyron пишет: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> developers who did what they cared about and ignored everything and >> everyone else. >> > I don't know if I'm an exception to the rule, but I've always had fruitful >

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:06:29 -0700 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Well, maybe it's because you can talk to Python team, discuss and not > > get ignored by them. > > We've already established the

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Well, maybe it's because you can talk to Python team, discuss and not > get ignored by them. We've already established the same is true for the games team. I'm a living example of it and I can't imagine I'm the only

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 11:08:30 -0700 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I was stating the apparent state of facts. If people are told they're > > supposed to go with games team, use their eclass, follow their

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > I was stating the apparent state of facts. If people are told they're > supposed to go with games team, use their eclass, follow their > policies, that's how it looks to people. That's an entirely different point from

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:19:24 -0700 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:53 -0700 > > Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > > Not true. I've been maintaining games for a

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:53 -0700 > Denis Dupeyron wrote: > > Not true. I've been maintaining games for a decade and have never been > on > > the team. > > Quoting the previous documentation of

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:32:53 -0700 Denis Dupeyron wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > games team sole claim to games in gentoo. > > > > Not true. I've been maintaining games for a decade and have never been on > the team.

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > developers who did what they cared about and ignored everything and > everyone else. > I don't know if I'm an exception to the rule, but I've always had fruitful interactions with the games team. I never felt they

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-17 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 17 lutego 2016 08:52:31 CET, Michael Sterrett napisał(a): >On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Michał Górny >wrote: > >> The games team was pretty much formed of two kinds of developers back >then. One kind was retired developers, the other kind was

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-16 Thread Michael Sterrett
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > The games team was pretty much formed of two kinds of developers back then. > One kind was retired developers, the other kind was developers who did what > they cared about and ignored everything and everyone else. Bugs,

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-16 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 17 lutego 2016 03:09:18 CET, Daniel Campbell napisał(a): >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 02/08/2016 01:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 04:13:38 -0800 Daniel Campbell >> wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-16 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/08/2016 01:49 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 04:13:38 -0800 Daniel Campbell > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 02/07/2016 03:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sun, 7 Feb

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-09 Thread Ian Delaney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 04:13:38 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/07/2016 03:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:38:27 +0100 "M.B." wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 04:13:38 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 02/07/2016 03:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:38:27 +0100 "M.B." wrote: > > > >> Hello folks. > >> > >> While hacking

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-07 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/07/2016 03:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:38:27 +0100 "M.B." wrote: > >> Hello folks. >> >> While hacking away on a new ebuild I came across the issue that >> games.eclass apparently got banned from

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-07 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:38:27 +0100 "M.B." wrote: > Hello folks. > > While hacking away on a new ebuild I came across the issue that > games.eclass apparently got banned from future use. The only references > I was able to dig up (apart from helpful people on IRC), were >

Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy

2016-02-07 Thread Patrice Clement
Sunday 07 Feb 2016 11:38:27, M.B. wrote : > > Hello folks. > > While hacking away on a new ebuild I came across the issue that > games.eclass apparently got banned from future use. The only references > I was able to dig up (apart from helpful people on IRC), were >