Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). -mike I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:44:05 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:51:33 Mike Frysinger wrote: not really sure what you're referring to here. that bug is already fixed in latest glibc-2.14 ebuild. I mean, no need to open a new bug, just continue in that security bug, because the fixed version has never had stable keyword. -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
