On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as
I
lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 05:07:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
xchat hexchat are different packages. It's a bit like pretending that
the discontinuation and fork didn't ever happen, and the packages are
equivalent (which they are not, as have been already pointed out).
they're about as equivalent as
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
need to manually move config files and update logrotate.d files (if in
use), and the only
On 11/26/2012 01:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
need to manually move config files and
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:33:15AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote
the inability to make users read the package.mask message explaining
the situation is the only valid point in your e-mail.
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
Howsabout following the same procedure
On 26/11/2012 10:17, Walter Dnes wrote:
Howsabout following the same procedure as when xpdf was dropped? I
vaguely remember emerge --update --deep world stopping with a message
that xpdf was being dropped, and also a few alternatives were suggested
in the message.
That's the p.maks
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:17:13 +0100
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Maybe. On the other hand, the udev-systemd switch was performed
upstream which makes it a valid candidate for package move.
No, it's not a valid candidate for a package move if the destination
package already exists. A
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just move config in an elog? Oh, and they don't even use.
see what happens when you delete context ? it
On 11/25/2012 12:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I
lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did
this
before I'd like to have some help concerning this matter. Is there some
documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
Hey list,
I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of
weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be
resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more
Am Sonntag 25 November 2012, 22:03:03 schrieb hasufell:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
Hey list,
I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of
weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do xchat plugins work in hexchat?
That's something for me to find out as well. I maintain the
xchat-otr plugin which I would like to continue using in hexchat.
just tested xchat-xsys on hexchat and it does work, all commands afais
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I
lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did this
before I'd like to have some help concerning this matter. Is there some
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I
lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did
this
before
Am Sonntag 25 November 2012, 17:26:30 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon
as I lastrite xchat so people
Works here without problem
On Sun, 2005-17-04 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
the /video output gives you the right information.
If I get 10 reports
19 matches
Mail list logo
