Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-29 Thread William Hubbs
All, The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1. The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08 respectively. The more important part of this test is that we need some users to

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-29 Thread Dale
William Hubbs wrote: All, The openrc stable candidate is now openrc-0.8.2-r1. The changes between it and the previous stable candidates are small, so the news item date and stable request date are still 2011/05/01 and 2011/05/08 respectively. The more important part of this test is that we

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-29 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:22, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: The more important part of this test is that we need some users to migrate from baselayout-1 to openrc-0.8.2-r1 and be sure that is successful. I migrated a mostly-stable (so baselayout-1) amd64 server to baselayout-2.0.2

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-18 Thread Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote: ll, there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate. I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-18 Thread Philip Webb
110418 Marijn wrote: On 04/16/11 18:05, William Hubbs wrote: - news item release on 5/1 - stabilization on 5/8. Please, to avoid confusion, use month names instead of numbers or include the year so people don't have to deduce the ordering. Seconded. In fact, has Gentoo not adopted the

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-16 Thread William Hubbs
ll, there was a regression in 0.8.1, so 0.8.2 is now the stable candidate. I propose thatsince the differences between 0.8.1 and 0.8.2 are very small, we should keep the news item date and stabilization date from my original announcement. - news item release on 5/1 - stabilization on 5/8.

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Alex Alexander
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:56:22AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: All, at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate. This means we need more testers. We need some people who are still using baselayout-1 to migrate to baselayout-2 and openrc to make sure that still is successful. Also,

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 12/04/2011 16:56, William Hubbs a écrit : All, at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate. Thanks to all of you who worked on this over the years, your efforts are _really_ appreciated. This means we need more testers. Openrc being so central to Gentoo, may I suggest a bigger

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Marijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/13/11 08:52, Rémi Cardona wrote: Le 12/04/2011 16:56, William Hubbs a écrit : All, at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate. Thanks to all of you who worked on this over the years, your efforts are _really_ appreciated. This

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote: I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter? We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a huge deal for Gentoo. Although no doubt non-Gentoo people will

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Alex Alexander
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:00:44AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote: I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter? We should certainly get a news item together, since this

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:00:44 -0500 Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote: I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter? We should certainly get a news item

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:00:44AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote: We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a huge deal for Gentoo. Although no doubt non-Gentoo people will start laughing at yet another new init system. =) Openrc is not just a gentoo init system; I know that

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 08:00:44 Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 13:44 Wed 13 Apr , Marijn wrote: I would be very interested in seeing some kind of list/review of all the advantages of the new system. Idea for the Newsletter? We should certainly get a news item together, since this is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-13 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:54:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: also, we're still sitting on top of classical sysvinit, so i'm not sure openrc technically qualifies as an init system. certainly not a full one. That's true. Openrc is not really a full init system. It is a set of init

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.8.1 stable candidate

2011-04-12 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 04/12/11 16:56, William Hubbs wrote: All, at long last, we have an openrc stable candidate. Thanks to all who kept chiseling away at this issue - it's nice to see that we still can get things done, even if it sometimes takes a week or hundred more than initially planned. I hope it all