Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a): Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? Cheers, Alin Hi, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: Furthermore a lot of our patches are in the sed format and I happen to think that's a good thing. My current view is that sed patches should only be used where static patches don't work, ignoring laziness (including mine) for the moment. Why do you feel sed

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-24 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian Pipping wrote: Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: Furthermore a lot of our patches are in the sed format and I happen to think that's a good thing. My current view is that sed patches should only be used where static patches don't work,

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne neděle 22 Březen 2009 17:50:26 Alin Năstac napsal(a): Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? Cheers, Alin Hi, I was working on patches glep [1] (nothing final and it is highly in

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote: Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? And multiply number and total size of files in ${FILESDIR}? Ulrich

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Mounir Lamouri
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote: Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? And multiply number and total size of files

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Sunday 22 of March 2009 18:18:15 Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote: Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? And multiply number and total size of files in

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Mounir Lamouri mounir.lamo...@gmail.com wrote: Or just rename it ${PN}-bar.patch instead of ${P}-bar.patch if it is a patch for more than one ebuild version. But older ebuild has to be changed to make it works. The ${PV} in the patch name is a quick

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 22/03/2009 19:22, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : The ${PV} in the patch name is a quick indication of the age of a patch, the gnome herd especially *encourages* this behavior. What I used to do back when I was still bumping packages in the Gnome Herd, I would version the patch, but I would use

Re: [gentoo-dev] please stop using foo-${PV}-bar.patch in other ebuild versions than ${PV}

2009-03-22 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alin Năstac wrote: Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild versions than ${PV}. Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name? I opted to reply to your mail after reading all the other replies. FWIW, I agree with