On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:26:06 + Ciaran McCreesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| virtual/tr1-memory
| virtual/tr1-unordered-containers
| virtual/tr1-random
| virtual/tr1-regex
|
| Rather a lot of work, and rather icky...
Looking at this some more... We're probably talking about needing the
On 2007-01-30, Matthias Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope ... let's hope c++-0x comes out soon and that compiler vendors are
faster in implementing it than c++-98.
It's actually officially called (skipping all the admin stuff): C++09
That gives a good indication of when it is likely to
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:11:20 -0500 (EST) Caleb Tennis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| * Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
|
| * Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
| doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that =4.1 is being
| used even if it's
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:47:09 -0600 Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| * Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
| doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that =4.1 is being
| used even if it's installed.
|
| I haven't done my homework, so I'll just ask:
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
* Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
* Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that =4.1 is being used
even if it's installed.
* || ( ) deps, and hope that if the user has 4.1
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:36:33 +0100
Rémi Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie idea : g++ and boost both provide virtual/tr1
Newbie question : besides the fact that you would have to rebuild
packages if you changed the virtual, is there anything painfully
obvious why that would be a bad
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:24:31 + Stephen Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| And what exactly is required of a package providing virtual/tr1? If it
| has to implement the entirity of the TR, then g++-4.1 can't provide
| the virtual and the purpose is lost since the most used parts of the
|
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:24:31PM +, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:36:33 +0100
Rémi Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newbie idea : g++ and boost both provide virtual/tr1
Newbie question : besides the fact that you would have to rebuild
packages if you changed the
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
| virtual/tr-[arbitrary version 1]
| can be 'almost full 1 support'.
Which means what, in terms of parts of tr1 that are and aren't supplied
by various
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:38:04PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
| virtual/tr-[arbitrary version 1]
| can be 'almost full 1 support'.
Which means
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:49 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:38:04PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
| |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:41:56 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:40 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | What is the best way to handle packages that require parts of
| | tr1? The options
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
bringing it up to 3.3MBytes of code, about 3.2MBytes of which is
compiler bug workarounds and boost-review-process-induced mutual
masturbation.
So the safest route is either bundle boost (that is heavy as you shown
in detail) and/or just depend on it at least for now.
On 30.01.2007, at 09:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch to
| system on at configure time as done for other libs?
At something like five megs of code per application?
If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like minimal?
Philipp
--
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:36:35 +0200 Philipp Riegger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On 30.01.2007, at 09:36, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
|
| | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch
| | to system on at configure time as done for other libs?
|
| At something like five megs of
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 06:27 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[ Background: tr1 is a set of extensions to the C++ Standard Library
giving various useful things like hash tables and smart pointers. There
are partial implementations included in g++-4.1 and boost and full
implementations available
On 30.01.2007, at 11:40, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch
| | to system on at configure time as done for other libs?
|
| At something like five megs of code per application?
|
| If you make that decidable by a USE-flag like
* Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
* Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that =4.1 is being used
even if it's installed.
I don't think these are necessarily compatible. tr1 is implemented in the
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Jan 30 2007, 12:27:49AM CST]
* Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
Agreed. Worse, it's a stop-gap measure, since presumably the long term
solution is for tr1 to be supported directly by the compiler on all
archs. So, any work done with this approach
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
What is the best way to handle packages that require parts of tr1? The
options appear to be:
* have the application bundle a static implementation and switch to
system on at configure time as done for other libs?
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:40 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| What is the best way to handle packages that require parts of tr1?
| The options appear to be:
|
|
| * have the application bundle a static implementation and switch to
| system on at configure
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:30:40 +0100 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| What is the best way to handle packages that require parts of tr1?
| The options appear to be:
|
|
| * have the application bundle a static implementation and
22 matches
Mail list logo
