On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 12:10 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> Similarly, if we get rid of the vim-syntax flag, should we phase out
> the emacs USE flag, too?
I would say no because in almost all cases the emacs code needs to be
compiled and that requires emacs to be present.
As far as I
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
>> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> The flag also pulls in additional dependencies for some ebuilds.
>> So I wonder how it could be made unconditional? For example,
>> app-admin/eselect[vim-syntax] depends on app-vim/eselect-syntax
>> which in turn will pull in vim or gvim.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
>> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax"
>> USE flag is enabled, while others
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax"
> USE flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
> Do these files fall into the "small text
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 05:46:04PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:00:16 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> > >
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Patrice Clement wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> Saturday 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39, Mike Gilbert wrote :
>> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
>> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
>> flag
On nie, 2017-07-23 at 17:46 +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:00:16 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > > Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> > >
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:00:16 +0100 Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> > inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> > flag
Hi Mike
Saturday 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39, Mike Gilbert wrote :
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files fall into the
On 07/22/2017 01:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these files fall into the "small text
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 16:27:39 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Packages currently handle installation of vim syntax support files
> inconsistently. Some builds install the files if the "vim-syntax" USE
> flag is enabled, while others install them unconditionally.
>
> Do these
13 matches
Mail list logo