On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 01:24:59AM +, M. J. Everitt wrote
> May I ask whether you've posted to the -musl ML about this, at all?
I wasn't aware of it. I'll check it out.
> In my limited experience of amd64 musl, you first install git without
> gpg, and layman from the regular portage tree
On 18/03/18 01:07, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:32:31PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
>> I'm trying to install musl (x86) on an old laptop.
> ...and getting nowhere. Can I have some guidance on filing a bug report
> on bugzilla? Is the 32-bit libmusl distro a "hosted project"? Us
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:32:31PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote
> I'm trying to install musl (x86) on an old laptop.
...and getting nowhere. Can I have some guidance on filing a bug report
on bugzilla? Is the 32-bit libmusl distro a "hosted project"? Using...
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experime
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:54:54PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote
>
> By default, stages are built with USE=bindist; and this should be the
> default in make.conf.
>
> OpenSSH requires that it is built with a version of OpenSSL that's built
> with the bindist flag in the same state. So if you enab
On 14/03/18 12:32, Walter Dnes wrote:
> ===
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> dev-libs/openssl:0
>
> (dev-libs/openssl-1.0.2n:0/0::
