Brian Kroth wrote:
I recommend using your home server as a build server and hosting the
portage tree there for the other clients to (auto)mount via NFS.
There's some docs in the wiki on how to do this. It will free you of
the need to be concerned about a separate portage partition on each of
these other machines.
Brian
Mikko Husari wrote:
Daniel Armyr kirjoitti:
i was wonderin, what kind of partition + fs table would be
optimal on server and/or desktop. What are you planning on using the
computer for? And when will you
need the rapid disk access that raid0 gives you? --DA
Well, it is just for sake of wondering, and it would not hurt to have
the speediest system ever, even if i would ever need it. That
server/desktop part means that i have desktop computers and one home
server. It also means that id like to know if the setup would be
different. The kind of stuff im wondering is, what should reside on
separate disks to receive any system speedup, even in theory.
well, my experiences with distcc has not been quite nice, some of the
packages does not behave well with distributed compiling... or what did
you mean with buildsystem? and searching from portage over nfs is much
slower than searching local portage tree...
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
