On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 05:15:15PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 02:10 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> > Either way, test, feeding stats back, etc, would be appreciated ;)
> > Thanks,
Hokay... so experimental-6 seems to be at least mostly stable now, no
tracebacks, no --metadata
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 02:10 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> Either way, test, feeding stats back, etc, would be appreciated ;)
> Thanks,
Here are my results on a 233Mhz Pentium MMX system.
Regards,
Paul
cpuinfo
===
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 5
model
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:56:38PM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
> Brian Harring ha scritto:
> > Rather then keep posting large patches here, just going to post them
> > to dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0 ... for example,
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0/3.0-cache-backpo
Brian Harring ha scritto:
> Rather then keep posting large patches here, just going to post them
> to dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0 ... for example,
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0/3.0-cache-backport-experimental-4.patch
>
>
> should be pulled rather then previous patch.
>
