Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary to
fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Okay, new suggestion.
>
> Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary
> to
> fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
> 2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon an
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary to
fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon and get trunk out masked
at around the same time. As soon as 2.0.54 goes
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 00:21, Alec Warner wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Okay, new suggestion.
> >
> > Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
> > necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is.
> > That would be 2.0.54 as per the attached pat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
>
>
> Okay, new suggestion.
>
> Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary
> to
> fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
> 2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get
On Thursday 01 December 2005 22:28, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Monday 28 November 2005 03:49, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:09, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > >>Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > >>Well, the vote was more for the SHA1 change actually as that's the one
