On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:29, Zac Medico wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is.
That
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is.
That would be 2.0.54
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm going to make a decision and offer until Friday (Saturday in
my time) for opposers to solidify and state any opposition. If
there's no solid opposition, Saturday I will put current trunk into
~arch as
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 01:01, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's no solid opposition, Saturday I will put current trunk into
~arch as 2.1_beta20051210.
Well, I've already stated several times that IMO using a 2.1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 01:01, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's no solid opposition, Saturday I will put current trunk into
~arch as 2.1_beta20051210.
Well, I've already stated several times
