[gentoo-portage-dev] /etc/portage/profile/{pmask,arch.list, categories}

2006-01-09 Thread Alec Warner
Apparently these weren't working ( not being read in ) due to a lack of /etc/portage/profile being in Locations in config in portage.py I split a patch for hte issue by simply adding the extra location and fixing the odd grabfile_package calls. It seems grabfile package was stripping the - so

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Package moves in overlays

2006-01-09 Thread Mike Auty
Yeah, Sorry about the double posting, patrick told me about a gmail feature that means you never see your own posts... I agree that the updates should only affect that individual tree. Whilst I can imagine cases where a move in the main tree should affect overlay trees (such as

[gentoo-portage-dev] Fwd: /etc/portage/profile/{pmask,arch.list, categories}

2006-01-09 Thread Alec Warner
My Apologies, KMail died, and when I restarted it it had the mail but stripped the attachment ;) -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: /etc/portage/profile/{pmask,arch.list, categories} Date: Monday 09 January 2006 09:59 From: Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Package moves in overlays

2006-01-09 Thread Marius Mauch
Mike Auty wrote: Yeah, I agree that the updates should only affect that individual tree. Whilst I can imagine cases where a move in the main tree should affect overlay trees (such as recategorizing some net-misc ebuilds into a net-proxy category), that could at least be emulated with a