-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I've written a patch [1] that adds support for tracing python. It uses pythons
debugger hooks [2] to trace execution events (mostly function calls and
returns).
The patch causes python tracing to be enabled in --debug mode if
Paul Marks wrote:
Paul Marks wrote:
I couldn't get my lirc-0.8.0 to compile with the new kernel 2.6.16,
so I pulled a couple files out of CVS and generated this patch. It
works for me on 2.6.16 now.
Sorry, I think I may have sent this to the wrong list. I better go
read more carefully and
I was thinking about it, too, and found something i do like maybe more.
It would be not binary, but code dependancy. This is limited to
specific languages, then, but after all, there may also be different
binary dependencies, too [for example, you may depend on fonts
images from another package].
I hope you did read my previous mail of code dependancy -- if not, it's
at the end of message. This here is not so much overthought thing, but
a good starting point, maybe, if code deps are used.
Anyway, i give here the same idea in more complete form and good syntax
(good, because it could be
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 19:40 +0200, tvali wrote:
I was thinking about it, too, and found something i do like maybe
more. It would be not binary, but code dependancy. This is limited to
specific languages, then, but after all, there may also be different
binary dependencies, too [for example,
2006/3/22, Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are a few reasons why this won't work :-)First: What if I have assembler? python? perl?Your example is limited to the C preprocessor.
Yes that i did tell there that it's limited to c already :) but bin
dep, after all, is limited to lib dependencies
As an addition to code deps discussion.
I didnt understand exactly, why bin deps were supposed to be better
than what we have now, as i am not yet exactly sure what we have :)
Anyway, i see one basic plus of code deps. It's that you may have huge
number of codelines, all containing #defines and
On Tue, 2006-21-03 at 10:50 -0600, MIkey wrote:
tvali wrote:
So, if portage would be looked as lists and operations with lists
(calculating dependencies of package would be operation with list of
that package and list of all - portage tree -, then); building tools
[shell commands] for
