[gentoo-portage-dev] backend support for FEATURES=debug-build (again)

2006-05-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
no one responded last time about this patch so lets try one more time :P backend support for FEATURES=debug-build ... no hooks/hacks/etc... included here to handle a user interface `emerge --debug-build` -mike Index: pym/portage.py =

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-05-09 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 m h wrote: > Fair enough, if the trunk is frozen, I wish that would have been > indicated to me. No one has said that yet. The patches don't add any > functionality per se, but could be seen as bug fixes for > sloppy/extraneous code ;) > > Again, th

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-05-09 Thread m h
On 5/9/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: m h posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 08 May 2006 21:38:49 -0700: > hat is the status of my patches? I'm assumming that they are > rejected... I'm curious the know the reason. If the plan is to > migrate to a new improved versi

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-05-09 Thread Duncan
m h posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 08 May 2006 21:38:49 -0700: > hat is the status of my patches? I'm assumming that they are > rejected... I'm curious the know the reason. If the plan is to > migrate to a new improved version of portage (sooner rather than > later), the