On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 18:20 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > Things can be fast tracked if it's better for the overall health of the > tree. The 30 thing is just a general guideline and more so before we > had any arch teams/ATs/etc... Now that we have arch teams the QA/stable > process has been highly improved. > > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 14:49 -0500, Paul Varner wrote: > > If portage-2.1 is requested to be marked stable before then, we need to > > also make the same request for gentoolkit, so that we don't break it.
I don't think that we need to fast track marking gentoolkit-0.2.2 stable at this point. However, as my last paragraph states, if portage-2.1 is going to go stable before then, we should then fast track gentoolkit. Regards, Paul -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
