Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:19, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:48:05AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 31 July 2006 23:57, Drake Wyrm wrote: The question I'm trying to ask is this: =foo-1.2.* should obviously match foo-1.2.3, but should it also match on foo-1.2?

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 02:58, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: - =sys-devel/autoconf-2.1* matches autoconf-2.13 (found in net-proxy/privoxy and dev-tcltk/expect) this is because stupid portage lacks SLOT deps - =sys-devel/autoconf-2.5* matches autoconf-2.59 (found in

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 15:49, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: - =sys-libs/db-1.8* matches 1.85 (found in net-nds/directoryadministrator) - =app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets-1.6* matches 1.68.1 and 1.69.1 (found in media-sound/solfege) these should actually be SLOT deps, but portage

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Simon Stelling
Brian Harring wrote: Response to this is that well don't have versions like that, which while valid, is ignoring the point- cpvs are exact in their version specification, there isn't anything implicit about them. This sounds to me like 'division through zero doesn't make sense, but i've

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior

2006-08-02 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 01 August 2006 15:49, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: - =sys-libs/db-1.8* matches 1.85 (found in net-nds/directoryadministrator) - =app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets-1.6* matches 1.68.1 and 1.69.1 (found in