Zac Medico posted on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:36:28 -0800 as excerpted:
> There's no replacement for it yet, so yes, for now that seems like the
> best option if you need such fine-grained control.
Thanks. Done. =:^)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a l
Duncan wrote:
> Now remove sets don't work. What are the options? The most direct is to
> simply create my own set listing everything I want, but that won't
> account for anything added to the sets as they appear upstream over
> time. What to do about that?
>
> I suppose I could create an up
